So, LtCol Tharp and were proofreading last night—as we continued to bicker—when it occurred to us:
(Note: I’m “Blue,” and he’s “Gray.”)
I sent him a link to two charities that tug at my heartstrings, each in a different way:
So that’s what we decided. You have to pay to vote—even if it’s just a dollar. But every penny goes to helping someone else.
THEREFORE …
If you think I won, you donate to Claire’s Covid-19 relief fund. (Red button below.)
If you think he won, you donate to LtCol Adam C. Tharp’s Covid-19 relief fund. (Red button below.)
Don’t choose based on which charity you think the money’s going to, because we’re going to divide it equally among them all.
(But make sure I win: Because I’m right and you know it.)
If you’d like to review:
Summary:
Elected officials should be held to a “reasonable elected official” standard analogous to the reasonable person standard. If they fail to behave with the same degree of care, knowledge, experience, fair-mindedness, and awareness as a hypothetical “reasonable elected official,” voters should relieve them of their responsibilities at the first available occasion.
Resolved:
This newsletter holds that the Trump Administration did not meet this standard.
Here’s my argument in favor of the resolution.
And here’s LtCol Tharpe’s argument against the resolution.
Ok, what I think at this point, without reviewing all the stuff, is this is the key point:
Epidemiologists thought this coronavirus was behaving like the MERS one. So the Trump administration response was consistent with this conclusion. But this one combines the infectiousness of the coronaviruses that cause the common cold with the lethalness of MERS.
From this, I need evidence that the Trump Administration should have known outside of China other than some ethical doctors sharing information, that this was not like MERS>